Uptime: docs in Miami (MIA) · U-24

Runbook U-24 for Uptime in Miami (MIA). Marker xserv-u-7fb338be4fd6. This page covers docs for LATAM operators, not a worldwide average.

Uptime: A note on cost and transit

Rollback for u-06 is a documented command, not a hope. Transit is billed as backup while Uptime prefers peering in Santiago. If cost spikes, the runbook cuts overflow to Bogotá before touching customer prefixes.

Uptime: Why it matters on this continent

Design for Uptime on letter U starts in São Paulo (GRU). Runbook u-01 keeps a single owner, a written rollback, and a traffic split that can be reversed without a global freeze. Neighbors in Santiago only take overflow after the local pool fails a health window.

Uptime: How XServ runs it day to day

Probes for Uptime (u-02) leave Santiago every 15s toward Bogotá. XServ pages the named owner if loss or RTT crosses the letter budget. A probe never shares a queue with bulk transfers, so a saturated WAN does not hide a dead PoP.

Uptime peering U-07

Peering for Uptime (u-07) prefers the IX fabric that already carries last-mile ISPs in Bogotá. Session counts and prefix limits are on the same page as the Miami backup path.

Uptime cache U-08

Cache rules for Uptime on u-08 keep language-correct objects near Miami. São Paulo is a sibling cache, not an origin. TTLs are short enough that a bad asset does not live through a weekend.

Uptime headers U-09

Headers for u-09 carry the letter, the region (GRU) and a request id. Uptime debugging in São Paulo should not require a packet capture in Santiago first.

Uptime timeouts U-10

Timeouts on u-10 are tighter than the WAN RTT to Bogotá. Uptime in Santiago fails fast and retries once; a third try needs a human because it is no longer a blip.