SLA / s

SLA: capacity in Miami (MIA) · S-04

xserv-s-92c5d81cec67

Runbook S-04 for SLA in Miami (MIA). Marker xserv-s-92c5d81cec67. This page covers capacity for LATAM operators, not a worldwide average.

SLA: Failure modes we actually see

Capacity notes for s-04 assume rainy-season power in Miami and festival peaks toward São Paulo. The failure we actually see is a single uplink, not a cartoon partition of the whole continent. Spare ports and a second provider sit on the same runbook.

SLA: How this letter ties to the rest

Handoff from letter S SLA into the rest of the platform uses the same request IDs as the gateway. Runbook s-05 names who accepts the ticket after São Paulo pages out. Santiago does not silently inherit the incident.

SLA: A note on cost and transit

Rollback for s-06 is a documented command, not a hope. Transit is billed as backup while SLA prefers peering in Santiago. If cost spikes, the runbook cuts overflow to Bogotá before touching customer prefixes.

SLA headers S-09

Headers for s-09 carry the letter, the region (GRU) and a request id. SLA debugging in São Paulo should not require a packet capture in Santiago first.

SLA timeouts S-10

Timeouts on s-10 are tighter than the WAN RTT to Bogotá. SLA in Santiago fails fast and retries once; a third try needs a human because it is no longer a blip.

SLA regions S-11

Region names on s-11 match DNS and tickets: Bogotá / BOG, with Miami as the documented pair. SLA dashboards never say “LATAM” as if it were one RTT.

SLA docs S-12

Public docs for letter S stay aligned with identifier xserv-s-pack. Page s-12 is the SLA slice operators search before the homepage. Edits in Miami show up in São Paulo on the next publish.

Is transit the default path?
No. Peering in Miami is default; transit to São Paulo is overflow and is billed that way.
Does SLA on letter S share fate with other letters?
The control plane is shared. Data-plane queues for SLA stay isolated, so incident s-01 cannot drain neighbor letters.